TokyoFreePress
      An interactive and taboo-free journalism based in Japan




     
 
Welcome to TokyoFreePress Tuesday, September 02 2014 @ 06:40 PM CDT
  View Printable Version 

America's Japanization in Its Final Stage - PART 1: Arizona Shooting

Anyone can become angry - that is easy. But to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose, and in the right way - this is not easy.
- Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics


Fully Japanized?
I am a belligerent person who firmly believes every one of us has the right to resort to homicide, including suicide, when all other means have been exhausted to eliminate someone who stands in our way. This is what the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is (or was, at least) all about.
It's true what Jared Lee Loughner did in Tucson, Arizona, on January 8 constituted a first-degree crime, and yet, that does not necessarily mean it was morally unjustifiable. Actually the first thing that popped up in my mind when I heard the news was that the gunman had just targeted the wrong person.

As a result, Loughner unwittingly made a heroine out of a harmless "Green Dog Democrat." On the surface, he can be likened to Lee Harvey Oswald who made the mediocre President an instant hero in November 1963. In fact, though, he is a far cry from Oswald because Mrs. Gabrielle Giffords is not that important political figure, after all.

To me, the real implication of the assassination attempt is that the process of America's Japanization is in its final stage now and cannot be reversed anymore.

Japan's Swords and Firearms Control Law has its origin in the Meiji Era when samurais were prohibited from carrying around their swords, but the fullfledged ban on portable weaponry was implemented for the first time when General Douglas MacArthur issued a directive in 1946.

It is noteworthy, however, that in reality the comprehensive ban ordered by MacArthur has not made any difference to public safety in this country. Throughout the Japanese history, practically no leaders, be it the Emperors, Prime Ministers or Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, have faced a serious attempt of assassination.

The way a dissident Japanese assaults a VIP is typified by the WWII veteran named Kenzo Okuzaki who had narrowly survived the bloody battle in New Guinea for the absurd cause of preserving the polity centered around the imperial institution. In 1969, he "assaulted" the Emperor with a kiddie's slingshot. Although the two small pachinko balls (pinballs) fell short of hitting the bastard, Okuzaki had to serve a 13-year prison term. He could have used a firearm if he had really wanted to kill Hirohito, but it was only in 1983 that he used one. At that time he seriously injured a son of his former boss and got a shorter prison term.

From this, you can safely conclude that in no event do the Japanese show the guts to kill their leaders. This is where lies a fundamental difference between the Japanese and other peoples. Even Adolf Hitler narrowly escaped assassination attempts on several occasions. That is why he chose to kill himself in the face of the siege of Berlin by the allied forces. On the other hand, it did not cross Hirohito's mind that he might as well disembowel himself in the last days of the war.

Not that Japan is an assassination-free society - far from it. Quite a few people have been murdered, either covertly or in broad daylight. Maverick lawmaker Koki Ishii, for one, was stabbed to death in October 2002 when he was digging into the dubious process of the "cleanup" of bad loans at failed megabanks. Most probably, this wouldn't have happened if he had been the Prime Minister at that time.

These are basically why Japan's imperial lineage has never been disrupted in the last 2,670 years since the son of the Sun Goddess allegedly founded this country.

A Wikipedia entry about the concept of Japanization also refers to it as Tennoization (literally translated as Emperorization.) This is very correct because in Japan, the Emperor, and the Prime Minister to a lesser degree, are fully guaranteed the safety of life no matter how they have caused their subjects to suffer an intolerable plight.

Now that the Americans have developed a tendency to direct their anger to the wrong ones, as the Japanese always do, the Black Dog at the White House should rest assured that he will never be targeted.

With their nation increasingly mirroring Japan, the American people will soon start killing each other, and sometimes their own selves.
· read more (209 words)
  View Printable Version 

Come on, Joe, Mammals of the Order Primates Never Progress or Retrogress That Way

The dictionary definition of the intransitive verb "progress" normally goes like this: "To advance toward a higher or better stage, as in technologies." This is too ambiguous to answer the question about how exactly mankind evolves - or devolves for that matter.
I would define the word this way: "To improve quality of life in a way which is measurable against one's specific sense of values." Who said, for instance, the amount of industrial rubbish churned out by hundred million apes can serve as a primary indicator of the progress they have made?

No matter how you define the word, you can't deny Kan Tsutagawa, Managing Editor of the Yomiuri Shimbun, is in the same developmental stage as Japanese monkey's. Defamation is not my favorite pastime in particular, but I think I would be able to defend myself if the ape dared to sue me for libel.

American vultures flocking around Japan's carcass

To mark the turn of the year "amid a political imbroglio and diplomatic rifts," Tsutagawa placed an interview piece atop the front page of the year's first edition of the daily. The interviewee, James L. Huffman, professor emeritus at Wittenberg University, said, as he was supposed to say, that the Japanese still show "innovativeness" and "entrepreneurial spirit" because of, not despite, the fact that their leaders are so inept and incompetent. Just in order to cajole the braindead folks in this country, the shameless guy went as far as to do a stunt of logical acrobatism.

The Managing Editor certainly knows that the only way to assure the world's most gullible Japanese, including himself, that this country is not really done yet is to seek advice from Westerners, especially American scholars and pundits. To follow up Huffman's gibberish, Tsutagawa has now started running a series of interview pieces under the title of "Reformation of Japan."

For its first instalment, he picked Joseph Nye. The Harvard professor gave a sickening flattery about Japan's future. At the beginning of the interview, Nye said: "Japan is an amazing society that reinvented itself in the Meiji Restoration, and became the first Asian power to deal with globalization. After 1945, it did it again and became the second largest economy in the world. I remember [International Court of Justice President Hisashi Owada] saying [around 2000] that it was time for the third reinvention."

As usual nobody wondered if the self-proclaimed Japan "expert" is suffering senile dementia. But I am quite sure that is the case.

"Reinvention" Cycle

I have quickly prepared the following chronology to help you refresh your knowledge about the modern history of Japan.

Year Event Note
1853 Centralized feudal system collapses Triggered by Commodore Perry's surprise visit
1868 Meiji Restoration - 1st year of Reinvention 1 --
1945 Imperial Japan collapses Emperor survives the collapse
1952 Japan regains its nominal sovereignty - 1st year of Reinvention 2 Through the San Francisco Treaty of 1951
1968 Japan becomes world's 2nd largest economy --
1990 Bubble economy collapses --
2010 China overtakes Japan as No. 2 --
2013 Japan to overtake China once again - 1st year of Reinvention 3 Predictions by Gordon G. Chang, et al.

NOTE: The word "Reinvention" is Nye's, not mine.

What do you make of this?

The fatal outcome of the first Reinvention

Nye's first Reinvention started with Japan's aspiration for 富国強兵 (Wealthy Nation and Strong Army.) To that end the Meiji Emperor and his government instilled in their subjects an idea that this goal could only be achieved by the 和魂洋才 (Japanese Spirit and Western Learning) mindset.

Toward the early-1940s, these slogans were supplanted by a more belligerent one that went: 一億火の玉となって ([Let's beat America and Britain with] one hundred million hearts beating as one.) This way the grandson of the Meiji Emperor drove tens of millions of his subjects into the unwinnable war - until it proved the spectacular headway attained that way wouldn't last long.

For an obvious reason, however, nobody has ever asked why the recipe for modernization since the Meiji Restoration could not secure an sustainable progress. Actually the reason is quite simple.

As I have said many times before, technological development follows a linear path whereas nontechnological aspects of life advance along nonlinear paths. But to be more precise, the human element of technologies, which I call humanware, does not always go in tandem with the other two elements of technologies - hardware and software. And that is precisely why the "Japanese spirit and Western learning" mentality eventually aborted Japan's progress.

For one thing, user feedback is something technologists can't live without for long. My father, for one, found himself totally useless in the last days of the Pacific War. In those days, aeronautical engineers were told to concentrate on the suicide machines which did not have to fly high, fast or long.

So the bottomline of the first round of the Reinvention of Japan is that the purpose of life and the tools to pursue it were fatally cut off from each other.

Double-edged sword reinvented in the postwar period

From 1945 through 1951, Douglas MacArthur reigned as the "Second Emperor" although he looked more like the first Emperor himself. At the same time he also played the role of the Second Perry. As a result, we saw the country being rebuilt essentially on the same concept of the Meiji Restoration. Although the old prescription had already been tested unworkable, the Japanese made believe it would succeed this time around because the new Constitution categorically renounces war as means of settling international disputes, and the Emperor had been demoted to a mere symbol of national unity.

Against this backdrop, you can easily imagine what happened to Japan's value-creating chain when the country was granted a nominal sovereign power by the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951.

The ends and the means still remained cut off from each other. But now in the absence of the purpose of life, the Japanese have started substituting growth-enabling technologies for the values which they should be living for. It is none other than this inversion of the ends and the means that made this country the world's second largest economy in a matter of 23 years after the war defeat.

But exactly for the same reason, Japan failed once again in a matter of two decades since the American idiot named Herman Kahn announced the opening of the Japanese Century.

Yet, nobody has learned the lesson that the progress made by thinking-disabled people such as the Japanese can never be sustainable. At the height of the bubble economy of the '80s, Japan's media kept saying 一億総白痴化 ([the country can keep growing only when] one hundred million are ready to become idiots.) The new slogan tells all the truth about the second round of Japan's Reinvention.

Now the cute robot developed by Toyota can play the violin for you and tens of millions of Japanese from 2 to 92 are burogu-ing and tsuittar-ing on the Web, but nobody can tell what for. Japan's Self-Defense Forces are equipped with pricey, state-of-the-art weapons made in the U.S.A, but nobody can tell where to use them without killing their enemy, either.

Third Time Lucky?

With an eye clouded with an obsolete ideology and vested interests he has in Japan, Nye keeps disseminating the funny idea that the country has magical power with which to defy the Newton Dynamics. According to the dementia-suffering Harvard professor, the unique way the Japanese progress is to take two steps forward, then one step backward, and repeat this spasm-like pattern over and over. Fortunately for Tsutagawa and his fellow editors, Nye is not alone. He is a mainstreamer; there are quite a few like-minded scholars and pundits on both sides of the Pacific.

To me it's a matter of commonsense that you can't do the same thing for the third time and expect a different outcome. The fact of the matter remains that Japan has sunk and will never come back to the surface to stay there for years.

On September 9 last year, Mr. Gordon G. Chang, influential China expert, wrote on Forbes.com that China's will be the shortest-ever century because Japan will overtake China by 2013. When Nikkei.com published the Japanese translation of Chang's post, his prophecy really ecstasized the Japanese.

They must have thought, "In Japan the one hundred million hearts of the world's most docile people can beat as one when it is necessary, whereas in China the 1.3 billion hearts of these unruly people can never." This unrealistic way of thinking is exactly what made their parents and grandparents underestimate American power in 1942. They thought that the nation of individualism was a sitting duck and it would be a surefire to win the war against it.
· read more (478 words)

  View Printable Version 

[NEW YEAR's FEATURE] THINK, or Sink Like the Japanese


I was in business in this country from 1959 through 2005. In the first thirty years of my 46-year career, I learned a lot about business from management experts such as Peter F. Drucker and industrialists such as Frederick W. Taylor.

When I joined the Japanese subsidiary of Big Blue almost half-a-century ago, I was impressed to see the one-word signs that read "THINK" all over the workplace. I was told Thomas J. Watson, Sr., de facto founder of IBM, had made it the company credo.

For many years that ensued, America was, to me, a "thinking nation" more than anything else.

Today I still have great difficulty getting used to an America that does not think anymore. Its people "think" they are still thinking as their parents and grandparents did, but that is far from true. As has been the case with the Japanese, they now use their retrogressing brains only to find ways to economize on mental effort. As a result, they are processing information just on an ear-to-mouth basis. That's why they keep tweeting all the time these days.

On December 10, Bill Clinton visited Barack Hussein Obama at the White House to express his support for the tax cut compromise reached between the President and Congressional Republicans. When the former President emerged from the briefing room, he told reporters that the two men had had a "terrific meeting." At the end of his ad hoc speech, Clinton reportedly said:

"The United States has suffered a severe financial collapse. These things take longer to get over than normal recessions. We must first make sure we keep getting over it. We don't want to slip back down as Japan did."

Apparently, the American people think this was a clear manifestation of deep concern and firm resolve of the former and current Presidents about the problems facing the U.S.

But hold on a second.

From their empty, ill-defined and worn-out words, you can tell for sure that Clinton and Obama have never really thought, or will never really think about the root cause of the problems, let alone how to fix them. All they can do is to scratch the surface of these issues.

In his 1992 book titled The Bubble Economy, Christopher Wood, economic analyst at CLSA, wrote:

"America certainly suffers from an overdose of financial rot and empty buildings, [but not to the extent that Japan did in the 1980s.] America is an extraordinarily open society where the dirty linen is hung out for all to see [whereas] Japan is devilishly opaque."

Wood's observation about Japan was right because it is true its people have unrivaled skills to sweep unpleasant truths under the carpet. But he was wrong about America. Despite the widespread myth about its openness, America isn't a "brutally transparent" nation anymore. Its leader needs to have good insight to find the "dirty linen" hung out in the backyard.

On the same false assumption as Wood's, the American voters have constantly lowered the hurdle for presidential candidates to clear. That is why they have settled for one thinking-disabled President after another in the last two decades.

To put it bluntly, most Americans can't think today.

You may ask what exactly I mean by the 5-letter word.

Once again, let's take the Japanese bubble economy for example.

To borrow Wood's words, "Isaac Newton arrived in Japan in 1990." Ever since so many analysts and lay observers have talked about why, and how, the bubble burst as if there is such a thing as a bubble that never bursts. But not a single person, that I know of, has discussed why and how the bubble was formed in the first place.

The typical passenger view often has it that the burst was nothing but a spell of hiccups. That is why the Japanese have remained essentially unchanged all along. As anyone with a certain amount of commonsense can tell, it can't be true the people whose "diligence" and "innovativeness" made the postwar miracle possible and the people who look helplessly inept and purposeless today are two different species.

On the other hand professional analysts argue that the burst was one of those cyclic things just aggravated by some missteps by the monetary authorities. Wood argued in 1992 that as a result of the burst, Japan would have to change, as it did many times in the past, in order to "converge substantially with the West." He went on to say, "The country should emerge from its current distress a fully signed-up member of the international community, heart, head and maybe even soul."

But unfortunately for the CLSA chief strategist, that has not happened in the last 18 years simply because people's "heart, head and soul" are something you can't buy on the market.

Instead, Isaac Newton went across the Pacific Ocean in the fall of 2008.

When Clinton said he doesn't want to see his country slip back down like Japan did, with Obama standing alongside him, he didn't know what exactly he was talking about. The American people should not assume the thinking-disabled former President has learned lessons from Japan's failure any more than Obama has.

Actually you can track back Japan's misfortune well beyond the early-1980s. At least it dates back to 1945 when another brainless President thought he was paving the way for the reconstruction of Japan.

It's quite OK if Harry S. Truman intended to build an unviable nation here on the flattened archipelago because, then, the third vivisection next to the ones conducted in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was also a success. It's the world's most gullible Japanese who should take all the blame for the outcome of Truman's experiment. But what if Washington was well-intended? Then, it's a different story; now it's Americans' turn to suffer all the consequences of their leaders' inability to think.

I am not alone in seeing unmistakable signs that the entire nation of America is quickly getting Japanized in recent years. Presumably that is, at least in part, because of the obscene alliance between the two countries. In fact, it's very easy to become a white, black or brown Japanese; you just stop thinking. Then you start suffering just like the Japanese have in the last fifty years.

Yet, I don't know if the American people will wake up to show their resilience before it is too late. It now all hinges on their willingness to resume thinking, instead of just swallowing all the hogwash they hear from policymakers of both camps, or mainstream pundits and scholars covertly retained by them.

If you are ready to start your thinking-exercise right away, here's my tip:
· read more (231 words)
  View Printable Version 

James Huffman is One of Those American Vultures Flocking around the Carcass of Japan


With Japan's "lost 20 years" being extended into another decade, the Japanese are dying for assurances and reassurances from America that their country is not really done yet. And that's where self-proclaimed Japan experts in the U.S. swoop down one after another like a flock of starved vultures.

It takes a firstrate chutzpah to rope people into believing Japan still shows vital signs without the help of a life-support system, but actually not a few American pundits and scholars have that impudence.

James L. Huffman, professor emeritus at Wittenberg University in Springfield, Ohio (photo) is one of them. Like many others, the professor is ready to do whatever it takes to feed on the dead meat.

The Commentary page of the January 1 edition of the Daily Yomiuri features a breathtakingly ridiculous interview piece under the title of "Incompetent leaders no hindrance to progress." The caption summarizes the comments Huffman made in response to the phony questions raised by Cameron McLauchlan, DY staff writer, on behalf of Japanese suckers.

At the beginning, McLauchlan asked: "Japanese governments over the years have often been described as weak and leaderless. So where has the energy that developed Japan into a major power come from?" So the entire interview was conducted based on the false assumption that this country still remains a major power after all these lost 20 years.

They made believe Japan's international competitiveness has not fallen from No. 1 in 1990 to No. 27 in 2010, and that the accelerated exodus of top-notch scientists and engineers to China is an imaginary thing. This was only to allow the fraudulent professor to resort to his special skills in acrobatic logic to make absurd argumentation such as this:

"The Japanese people have always had an entrepreneurial spirit. They have always been highly innovative. That spirit may spring partly from the fact that government control has been lacking, or at least highly ineffective, in some periods."

But at the end of the interview, the interviewer and interviewee betrayed their transparent sophism. McLauchlan asked: "As a historian, what advice would you give to Japanese leaders today?"

Huffman should have answered, "As I said, the ineffectiveness on the part of the government fosters, rather than hinders, the innovativeness on the part of the people. In that sense, Naoto Kan is an ideal prime minister and needs no advice from me." Instead, however, the American historian had the nerve to say matter-of-factly that Kan should learn from the early-Meiji politicians such as Hirobumi Ito or Aritomo Yamagata who were driven by national prosperity and strength.

This indicates that the old Japan expert has lost touch with the subject country. Actually, Kan has learned too much from the early days of Japan's aspiration for a modern nation-state to learn how it ended up in failure in 1945.
· read more (70 words)
  View Printable Version 

The Year of the Tiger in Retrospect


The tiger looks
unwilling to step
aside for the
rabbit

This is how I look back on the year 2010.

Just Awaiting My Turn

Time flies, indeed. Two years ago my health started to deteriorate dramatically. Initially I thought I had to take specific actions to prepare myself to say goodbye to all in a decent way. On second thought, however, I realized that it doesn't make any difference whether or not my I exit looks graceful. I just perish, and that's it.

Now my only problem is that the progress of the constant worsening of my incurable ailments is too slow to tolerate. As a result, I have grown impatient more than ever with things and people, especially when they waste my limited time.

Even when in business I was always irritated by my Japanese colleagues who were invariably dull-witted as fluorescent lamps. One day I blamed one of my direct reports for his goof, though in a roundabout way. The next morning, he showed up in my office and said, "Your criticism is something like a time bomb. It always hits me only when I go to bed. As usual it dawned on me that you had told me to change my way of doing things only before I fell asleep last night." It always takes time like this in this country.

The talking ATMs are also an irritant. Five years ago I told you how talkative ATMs were in this country. Today they still remain intolerably verbose. Especially the taped female voices always get on my nerves. When withdrawing a small amount of money from my bank account, I normally press the "English Conversation" button just because the voices of English speaking women are less syrupy. Yet, at the end of my transaction, we close our conversation like this:

Me: Yes, I'm 120% sure I have everything.
ATM: Are you sure you have everything? (Everything means the card I inserted in her, money I withdrew from her and the voucher for the transaction.)
Me: You're welcome in advance.
ATM: Thanks for using me. I hope you'll come back soon.

Hate to See Dat Evening Sun Go Down


In a way it's saddening to find myself barking at Americans throughout the year because it's their parents and grandparents who taught me always to play it straight and honest.

Perhaps it's another fallout from the further worsening of my health that I now view things unfolding on this side of heaven as if from the other side. I'm quite confident that I am unbiased when I say Japan is a dead nation and that America is also heading for ruin. Not that I haven't had to correct myself at times, but I'm not like those American pundits who have to correct themselves every second day.

In December 1948 Douglas MacArthur ordered the release of Nobusuke Kishi, one of the Class-A war criminals, from Tokyo's Sugamo Prison without giving any explanation for the pardon. Actually, the general and his boss in Washington intended to make Kishi pay for what he'd done in wartime with another unpardonable crime. The CIA employed him as its undercover agent who was to serve concurrently as Japan's Prime Minister. Just like the Shogun who was forced to swallow the unequal Convention of Kanagawa in 1854, Kishi signed the 1960 revision of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan.

Forty-nine years later, a small group of independent journalists filed a class action lawsuit with the Tokyo District Court, complaining the entire security arrangement was unlawful. But judges flatly turned down the accusation while the media were determined to shut their mouths even about the mere fact that the litigation was underway. Across the Pacific, the American people were also playing dumb. Or perhaps, they were all dumb in fact.

They have blacklisted countries such as Iran and North Korea as rogue states. I am at a loss over where, then, to classify the United States. My vocabulary of pejorative is too poor to describe such a shameless nation and its people who have lost self-esteem completely.

Lara

This past Christmas Day I turned 75, but it's heartening to know that there still are some young ladies who think of me on the morning of December 25. Lara is one of them.

Over the yearend, she is staying in Los Angeles, accompanied by her husband and son, to attend a conference being held there. On my birthday, Lara sent me a mail in which she wrote: "The first thing that popped up in my mind when I woke up this morning was that it's your birthday today."

Lara and I share the same wavelength because both of us are stateless at heart. We are Japanese, but only technically. It's true that we are greatly divided over how far to stress the positive side of statelessness, but that doesn't affect our friendship at all because we value differences and take each other very seriously.

What fosters our mutual respect is the fact that we don't give a damn about geographical or ideological boundaries. I don't know, or don't want to know, what political platform she subscribes to. All I know is the fact that Lara has the sensitivity and compassion of Japanese women at their best combined with realistic attitude toward life particular to Chinese women.

Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea


Throughout the year, the Japanese have remained stranded in the same insoluble dilemma between the firstrate idiots named Yukio Hatoyama and Naoto Kan and the topnotch bandit named Ichiro Ozawa. One year ago I suggested in this blog that someone should take Ozawa's life, or I would have volunteered to kill the villain myself if I'd possessed a firearm.
· read more (326 words)
  View Printable Version 

[FEATURE] An Assange-Proof Nation



Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA authored by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Tim Weiner is one of those informative but worthless books you never want to read again. It would be a total waste of time to reread such a fraudulent book.

The very first leaf of the extraordinarily voluminous book is almost blank only with a brief quote printed in the center as if it were an insurmountable oracle. It reads:

There are no secrets that time does not reveal.
- Jean Racine, Britannicus (1669)

I don't think Weiner had read or saw the French play that is said to depict historical episodes about the Roman Empire. But that doesn't matter. What matters is the fact that he thought he could help "time" unearth the whole truths just by mining for the newest crop of declassified documents at the U.S. National Archives. After all, Weiner is just one of those stupid and arrogant American pundits who don't notice there is a fundamental flaw of logic involved in the line from the French drama - something even a kindergarten kid may detect.

The author should have known who have suffered the most the consequences of these crimes committed by the CIA in the last six decades. It's not Harry S. Truman who signed the National Security Act of 1947 on which the intelligence agency was founded, Dwight D. Eisenhower who thought intelligence was "a distasteful but vital necessity," or Tim Weiner who revealed dark secrets about what successive directors of the agency did only to win yet another award.

It's us non-American citizens who have really suffered. Certainly "the docile satellite of the United States," as Chalmers Johnson called Japan, is one of the most affected nations.

For one thing, we were told in the book, officially for the first time, that Nobusuke Kishi, Japan's Prime Minister (1957-60,) was an undercover agent of the CIA when he signed the revision of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan.

With their long-held doubt about the lawfulness of the treaty finally confirmed, a small group of independent journalists filed a class action lawsuit with the Tokyo District Court in February last year. But it was a piece of cake for the judges to brush aside their complaint. This was yet another reminder that the judicial branch of the Japanese government is not an independent entity as the Constitution calls for, just like the government itself is a puppet of Washington.

More importantly, the poor plaintiffs woke up too late, as usual. Once missed, the right timing will never visit you once again.

The reason Weiner failed to make a bit of difference to the rotten relationship between the two countries is because he based his research work on a false assumption that the whole truth will come to the surface sooner or later as Racine may or may not have thought.

This brings me to Bertrand Russell, British philosopher and mathematician (1872-1970.) He was widely acknowledged as a dedicated anti-war activist, which is what he actually was after losing his unrivaled intellect. But very few know that Russell was also a realistic thinker when he was younger. In his book on education (I forgot its title) he wrote to this effect:

"People always say, 'A real talent should come into bloom on its own no matter what adversity is in its way.' But this is something like arguing there cannot be a perfect crime."

Before Weiner, we had already heard a lot of bullshit from "truth seekers" who found a lucrative business opportunity in the niche created by those mainstream ideologues and demagogues. It's these conspiracy theorists who first detoxified revelations of truth.

Now the mainstream media are rife with leaks of innumerable classified documents by WikiLeaks. Although similar whistleblowing sites are mushrooming on the web, the media don't really look upset. From their previous experiences, they know for sure that at the end of the day they can neutralize these whistleblowers, and even in the worst case, make their world's most gullible audiences dismiss the new herd of cyber-warriors as nerds or oddballs.

The only thing that explains all this ado about nothing is the fact that, as Russell exquisitely pointed out, there are perfect crimes, a lot of them.

A perfect crime does not necessarily have to be carried out in an artful way. Actually the words only refer to a crime whereof no victim notices he has been victimized, or a more cognizant victim is not vocal enough to be heard by many.

Needless to say, Japan's Emperors have perpetually committed unnoticed crimes in the last thirteen centuries. They have always succeeded despite the fact that the imperial lineage has been filled with mentally retarded bastards primarily because of repeated incestuous marriages. The only reason behind their success stories is because their subjects have been equally retarded.

In his 2006 book titled Princess Masako - Prisoner of the Chrysanthemum Throne, Australian writer Ben Hills revealed part of the dark secrets about Japan's imperial family. Unlike Legacy of Ashes, Princess Masako was instantly banned here simply because Hills' revelations were considered much more harmful.

Yet Japanese could have purchased a copy of Princess Masako through the likes of Amazon.com. By 2006, Japan's Internet Penetration Rate had already topped 80%. But as usual what I term the "Glass Firewall" which is far more unpenetrative than China's Great Firewall could keep the poisonous truths at bay.
· read more (112 words)
  View Printable Version 

Monster at U.S. State Department Chasing after Its Fellow Monsters in Foreign Lands

To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must first set our hearts and brains right so as to cultivate our personal life.
- Confucius




The mom of a
sonuvabitch in U.S.
State Department
Judging from your responses to my review piece on Chalmers Johnson's Dismantling the Empire: America's Last Best Hope, I have figured out that the time is not ripe yet to try to convince the American people that maintaining military bases all over the world is a "suicide option" as the late Johnson warned. Under the influence of patriotic idiots from both "conservative" and "liberal" camps of the nation, the American people are fully determined to brush aside any commonsense argument such as mine.

They stubbornly refuse to understand I'm not one of those empty-headed peaceniks like the moron in the White House. On the contrary, I think war is a great thing because more often than not it is filled with a promise of real change, while peace always stinks.

Why, then, do I disagree with these mainstream political analysts retained by the military-industrial complex of the U.S.?

Reason 1: For better or for worse, there will never be WWIII if the appellation should mean a nuclearized version of WWII as these crisis-mongers want us to envision it. 21st century's warfare is nothing like ones familiar to the lovers of spectacular films starring Bruce Willis.

Reason 2: More importantly, no one knows where to find the real enemy these days. Old hawks in America should know that not a single nation in history has waged a war against someone who held its IOUs worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

I must admit that by now the American people have grown too ignorant and arrogant to wake up before they run out of time. Yet, I hope that if there still remains some sanity in the corners of their minds, it will be a little easier for them to take my views of the nonmilitary part of America's interventionism a little more seriously.

In 1821 John Quincy Adams, the sixth President of the United States, said:

"America goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy."

190 years later, in the twilight years of the American century, we have a serious problem with the Monster in the U.S. State Department crusading against her fellow monsters in foreign lands.

The former shyster believes she has the right to police people's way of life on every corner of the world. And now that the nation of Confucius has started to threaten America's primacy, her fanaticism is going over the top.

Worse, America's arrogance has spilled over across the Atlantic. Emboldened by Clinton and other busybodies in America, an increasing number of Europeans have now started telling Asians what to do, and how to do it. Examples:

■ In October the Norwegian Nobel Committee thought the Chinese government should release Liu Xiaobo from jail because he is the year's Peace Prize laureate. (Actually, things unfolded the other way around; Liu was awarded the prize because he had been imprisoned.)

■ In November Reporters with(out) Borders (RSF) further elevated the Japanese media to No. 11 position as if Japan's Glass Firewall, which poses a more serious impediment to press freedom than China's Great Firewall, had been torn down. On the other hand, the "press freedom watchdog" thought China should remain at the bottom of the ranking primarily because many dissidents are still behind bars.

In short Thorbjoern Jagland, Chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee and Jean-Francois Julliard, Secretary General of RSF (I don't know how to create the French letter "C" with accent sedille on my computer) arrogantly thought the Western standards should apply everywhere in the world.

Yet, even these European bastards eclipse before the mom of a sonuvabitch in the U.S. Department of State.

When Colin Powell was Secretary of State, he signed the 2004 Trafficking in Persons Report, in which Japan was downgraded from "Tier 2" to "Tier 2 Watch List" on the ground that the country had imported too many sex slaves from its backyard countries. Then in 2005, Condi Rice moved up Japan back to the Tier 2 placement simply because then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, known for his perpetual abuse of women including his ex-wife and a geisha who committed suicide, had taken a legislative measure for import ban. Since the token measure was implemented, an increased number of Japanese men had to go abroad to buy sex.

Ever since I'd lost interest in the TIP Report until several days ago when I somehow started wondering how the annual report signed by the Monster was organized.

Out of curiosity I clicked the PDF file titled "TIP Report 2010" on State Department's website. I was overwhelmed by the unprecedentedly voluminous report; it took 10 minutes until my cheap computer finished downloading the 22MB, 373-page-long report.

Its content is essentially no different from the days Powell and Rice were in office but I see a distinctive fingerprint of the Monster in the monomaniac meticulosity with which the report was compiled.

Japan's placement remains unchanged at Tier 2. That indicates the Monster found the sexual behavior of Japanese men barely acceptable when compared to that of her adulterous husband.

If there is anything new in the latest edition of the report, the Monster had her men redefine the scope of the survey into the situation with modernday slavery in each country. For one thing, prostitution is now included in the list of "What is NOT Trafficking in Persons." Of course, that does not mean the Monster has ceded it to someone else as none of her babies. Presumably she gave it up to make her friend Angela Merkel happy. Germany where prostitution is flourishing is still among Tier-1 countries.

American taxpayers are funding the "discretionary" $55 billion/year operation with 25,000 direct employees on its payroll. If you take into account the fact that the State Department often rents out the USS George Washington from the Defense Department when the Monster's menacing look isn't effective enough, and that it habitually depends on CIA spies, you will find the stupidity of American taxpayers really appalling. Without doubt, they are heading for ruin.

Basically, it's none of my business, though. On this side of the Pacific, we are more concerned about intangible consequences from Washington's spending spree.
· read more (475 words)
  View Printable Version 

Don't Tell Me Reporters "without" Borders Knows No Borders

The phrase "Fourth Estate" was coined by an 18th century's Irish statesman Edmund Burke but now it's commonly used to stress the independence of the media from the three branches of a government. Personally I'm inclined to include "independent" experts in sociopolitical issues in the fourth branch of the regime because they can't live a day without the favor from the media.

In reality, though, not a single mainstream media organization is independent of the other estates. That is why someone founded Reporters without Borders, or Reporters sans Frontieres in French, in Montpellier, France as a "press freedom watchdog" 25 years ago. The nonprofit organization, now based in Paris, never refers to itself as RWB presumably because a "W" can stand for "with" as well as "without." Instead, it uses the French abbreviation, RSF, even in an English publication.

I don't know, neither do I want to know, when RSF started releasing its annual press freedom ranking.

With these in mind, let's take a look at the following table:

Country Ranking
2004
Ranking
2008
Ranking
2010
No. of Countries/Regions on the List 167 173 178
Canada 18 13 21
China 162 167 171
France 19 35 44
Germany 11 20 11
Italy 39 44 49
Japan 42 29 11
Russia 140 141 140
United Kingdom 30 23 19
United States (American Territory) 22 36 20
United States (Extra-Territorial, incl. Iraq) 108 119 99


In recent years RSF had already discredited itself as an independent body by favoring some countries and disfavoring some others apparently under the influence of obsolete ideologies flavored with liberal bias. But if you look at the most recent standings for the G8-plus-1 countries shown on the extreme right column, you will know these self-styled guardians of press freedom now look really like hordes of cretins.

Just take Japan for example.

Earlier this week, an Italian journalist by the name of Silvio Piersanti gave me an e-mail from his newsroom at Il Venerdi (Friday) to ask a very valid question. He was wondering about the reason behind Japan's quick ascension in the RSF ranking. He needed that information because he was writing an article on the Japanese media.

My answer was that there was no reason, whatsoever, for the phenomenal rise. The notoriously exclusive Kisha Kurabu (press club) system is still there and we don't see any sign that it's going to disappear anytime soon. Reporters and editors in the "information cartel" are still doing a good job by ingeniously standardizing, sanitizing and homogenizing news stories as Laurie Anne Freeman exquisitely described in her marvelous book, Closing the Shop.

The most recent news reports have it that in the face of the free fall of his cabinet approval rating, Prime Minister Naoto Kan is now thinking about joining forces with the largest opposition LDP over the yearend. In disseminating their speculation about Kan's survival strategy, media obscurantists are trying to immunize their gullible audiences for the idea that when something like that materializes, we call it a Grand Coalition. But actually, that's not what it is; it's yet another reunification of the twin parties coming from the same egg.

It's not that Japan's media are particularly in love with Akikan (an Empty Can) as Kan is dubbed lately. But they certainly know the last bastion of the current polity named the 1955 System is this Kisha Kurabu where the Fourth Estate can have a clandestine affair with any one of the other estates.

The first name of the Italian journalist reminded me of Silvio Berlusconi, the media tycoon. I asked him if he thinks Italy will quickly overtake Japan on the RSF list when the other Silvio resigns as prime minister. In response, he wrote:

"I'm afraid that he won't resign. His ultimate dream is to end his political career as President of the Italian Republic after changing the constitution to give him more decisional power. (His model is his close friend Putin.) If he manages to survive the current crisis (we will know it on Dec. 14th's confidence vote in Parliament) we'll have to stand him for several more years, unfortunately. This coming Saturday, there will be a big march through Rome against Berlusconi. We expect about 2 million people taking part in it. (snip) [But] the real problem is that the majority of Italians like Berlusconi; his Byzantine style of life, his cynical shrewdness."
· read more (380 words)

  View Printable Version 

[FEATURE] Which Country Will Collapse First - China, Japan or America?

It all started when I stumbled on this controversial book titled The Coming Collapse of China.

Until then I hadn't imagined that there could be an author specializing in the unscientific field called political "science" who, like management gurus such as Michael Hammer or Peter F. Drucker, wouldn't take it for granted that when the subject entity is big enough, it should be considered as a going concern.

As I wrote in those days, I didn't really care about the fate of China. Seven years later, I still remain that way because where the country is heading is basically none of my business. Recent rumors on the Web have it that Gordon Chang, the author of the book, has now revised his prophecy, saying the collapse will happen in ten years from now if not in 2011 as he originally predicted. My take on the rescheduling is: who knows, and who cares?

I still remember writing a long mail on March 1, 2003 to Mr. Chang. The subsequent exchange of views between us in more than 2,000 mails and one face-to-face talk at a sushi bar in Tokyo's Roppongi has helped me transform myself from a retired businessman into something else. As of now I am still unable to tell the name of the shore on which I was washed up.

Yet, I think I can give you some tips if you are a proponent or an opponent of any collapse theory.

There are two important questions you must ask yourself before discussing the probability of China's collapse, Japan's or America's.

Question 1:

"Am I planning to take specific steps to expedite or prevent it, or just forecasting about something I can't really internalize?"

As I wrote earlier this year, plans are one thing and forecasts are quite another. It is true that forecasting is an integral part of a plan, but if you remain uncommitted to your forecast, you can't call it a plan.

And if you are only betting on a horse, instead of jockeying yourself, you should know the fate of a nation has nothing in common with the result of the horse racing.

The same applies if you are a weatherman. You've got to be an idiot to claim you can foretell the weather of the day one year from now because you are equipped with state-of-the-art supercomputers hooked up to meteorological satellites.

You may still insist that you are committed to something or someone. But hold on a second.

The single most important thing to understand is that you can never commit yourself to faceless people or those living thousands miles away from your hometown. All you can actually do is to tweet, like a little birdie, about the doomed future of China, or the endless supremacy of America, for that matter.

Question 2:

"How do I define the word 'collapse'? Does one of those regime changes deserve to be called a collapse?"

Another way to ask about the same thing is: "Would I readily declare a brain-dead person dead?" If you wouldn't, you should drop all your argument for or against the collapse theory at hand.

In this "globalized" world where state-of-the-art life-support systems are available everywhere at affordable prices, it's highly improbable for any nation-state but tiny banana republics to literally fall apart.

With these questions always in mind, I started writing a book which I would have titled The Unviable Japan two and a half years ago. In retrospect, I suspect the American literary agent might not have pissed me off the way she did if I had thought about titling it The Coming Collapse of Japan; she wouldn't have been upset so much because then I was just forecasting Japan's future while remaining uncommitted to anything.
· read more (236 words)
  View Printable Version 

Who Said the Japanese Should Stay in the Same, Sinking Boat with the Americans?

Think of it as the eight-hundred-pound gorilla in the American living room: our long-standing reliance on imperialism and militarism in our relations with other countries and the vast, potentially ruinous global empire of bases that goes with it. The failure to begin to deal with our bloated military establishment and the profligate use of it in missions for which it is hopelessly inappropriate will, sooner rather than later, condemn the United States to a devastating trio of consequences: imperial overstretch, perpetual war, and insolvency, leading to a likely collapse similar to that of the former Soviet Union.
- Chalmers Johnson, July 30, 2009

Chalmers Johnson died on November 20 at the age of 79.

In today's America infested with demagogues and ideologues, scholars and pundits who address issues strictly based on facts as Johnson did are an endangered species. That is why the news from California somehow prompted me to place an order for his last book with amazon.com.

Actually Dismantling the Empire: America's Last Best Hope is an anthology of 15 essays written in the period from January 2004 through July 2009.

For his uniquely down-to-earth approach focused on "political economy" of subject countries, Johnson was known to be a "contrarian" scholar, and sometimes dismissed as an "oddball" among mainstreamers. Because of the prejudice, very little is known about him in the U.S. and elsewhere. So let me first summarize here his lustrous educational background and multihued occupational career.

In the 1950s, Johnson earned a BA degree in economics and a Ph.D. in political science from the University of California, Berkeley. During the Korean War, he was stationed in Japan as a naval officer. Later on, he taught at his alma mater, but at the same time he was a consultant for an affiliate of the CIA for some years.

Over time he developed a firm belief that it's imperative for serious researchers to receive the fullfledged education on the language and history of the subject country. This is exactly what differentiated him from other political scientists who always cut corners on their surface-scratching studies by neglecting the painstaking efforts to learn languages and histories.

How many Japan experts in the U.S., for instance, are discussing the subject country in an arrogant know-it-all attitude without comprehensive knowledge of the Japanese language and history?

To me talking about a country without knowing its culture inside out is something like an accounting-illiterate CEO trying to analyze the financial statements of his company. I find this "imperial hubris" all the more disgusting because of my personal experience with arrogant Americans in the last two and a half years.

Needless to say, one of the keys to understanding the message of this book is to refresh your definition of the word "imperialism." As usual not-too-many reviewers took Dismantling the Empire seriously on the ground that it's yet another manifestation of a wicked and unpatriotic ideology. Some even said it's totally unworthy of reading.

But now that you've known his bio, I hope you doubt that can be the case. In fact, those who read this book expecting to see all-too-familiar ideologies will be totally disappointed because the author only lets facts, some of them learned firsthand, tell their stories. In short his frequent reference to imperialism has nothing, whatsoever, to do with ideologies.

There's nothing new in the straightforward way Johnson defines the word. He says that imperialism is an international system where "militarily stronger nations dominate and exploit weaker ones."

As a political economist, Johnson primarily focuses on the financial aspects of imperialism. An essay dated July 2, 2009 puts the costs of maintaining "the U.S. Empire of Bases" at $102 billion a year. In another essay dated July 30, 2009, the author quotes Anita Dancs, an analyst for the website Foreign Policy in Focus, as saying the United States spends approximately $250 billion each year maintaining its global military presence." (I can't tell what the difference between the two figures represents, though.)

Johnson concludes that it's a "suicide option" to stay with imperialism which is "not only morally obscene, but fiscally unsustainable." As a former senior financial manager, I can't agree more.

Another keyword of the book is "blowback." Let's see how Johnson redefines the word that first appeared in a CIA postaction report in 1953. According to him, blowback does not simply refer to the unintended consequences of actions taken by the U.S. government, but more specifically to natural responses to such operations "that are kept secret from the American public and from most of their representatives in Congress."

The author presents a list of major countries that have given a blowback to the U.S. since 1953. Among other things, it's especially interesting to note that Japan isn't listed there. Johnson is absolutely right in deliberately excluding the "docile satellite" of the United States.

In the last 65 years, the U.S. has habitually played foul with Japan. So it's another miracle that America's Japan policy has never backfired. The bilateral relations haven't unfolded this way without reason.

Johnson was also known as an early "Japan revisionist" since the early-1980s when he was writing MITI and the Japanese Miracle. In those days he already coined a phrase "Cartels of the Mind" to describe the dark secret behind the economic and political miracle. So he is one of the very few Japan experts in the U.S. who know the reason why America hasn't faced a blowback from its Far Eastern ally.

In the last part of Dismantling the Empire, which was dated six months after Obama's inauguration, he specifically talks about "10 Steps Toward Liquidating the Empire." This is the only part I don't find really convincing primarily because a soul-searching step is missing there; I can't tell if it's Step Zero or Step 11.

The Americans, at large, have all taken it for granted that the world revolves around their country until the end of time, as did the Chinese 2.5 millenniums ago. The worst fallout from the Ptolemaic delusion is the fact that these people are totally incapable of introspection.

As it has become increasingly evident that the process of America's decline is no longer reversible, this "sophomoric ignoramus" resulting from their "infatuation with imperialism" has started taking a devastating toll on America's health. Unfortunately, though, very few Americans seem to have woken up so far to realize a serious self-examination should be Step Zero.

Especially it's deplorable as well as laughable to see these crisis-mongers in the U.S. inventing one crisis after another out of blowback. They do so simply because otherwise they would be out of work altogether.

Thank god, I still have a few good friends in America. One of them is a Montanan. He and I always take each other seriously and value differences. While awaiting the delivery of the book from amazon.com, I asked him to tell me his take on the idea of dismantling the empire. As usual he gave me a frank and thought-provoking input.

The only sentences I had difficulty understanding go like this:

"If Japan were serious about removing U.S. military bases, there [would be] only one way to do it. That would require hard work, money and some years. Japan would have to prove that it has developed a hard capability to defend itself well and to generate serious working military relationships with the rest of Asia. Our leaders would not accept a few guns and boats. Without that proof, no American bases will close."

I'm always inclined to play devil's advocate when discussing fundamental issues like this one. So my outlandish questions are:

■ Why would Japan have to prove anything to anyone before choosing its own course?
■ What if the Japanese have no intention, deep inside, to defend itself? Indications are that they would rather see Japan become the 51st state of America or 24th province of China than fight against anyone.
■ Which country(-ies) is Japan supposed to defend itself against?
■ Why would Japan have to seek an approval by the President of the United States when it comes up with a plan?
· read more (246 words)